Going for a run or cycling in a built-up area is still better for you than not exercising at all – despite the pollution, claims a new study.
Researchers concluded that air pollution should not be an excuse for sitting around at home when you could be working up a sweat outdoors.
And there were 20 per cent fewer deaths among those who exercised, despite pollution, than those who didn’t.
A team from Copenhagen University in Denmark decided to look at the fact that exercise is good for you whilst inhaling air pollution isn’t.
Study lead author Associate Professor Zorana Jovanovic Andersen, of the Centre for Epidemiology and Screening at the University of Copenhagen, said: “The beneficial effects of exercise are more important for our health than the negative effects of air pollution, in relation to the risk of premature mortality.
“In other words, benefits of exercise outweigh the harmful effects of air pollution.
“Even for those living in the most polluted areas of Copenhagen, it is healthier to go for a run, a walk or to cycle to work than it is to stay inactive.
“It is well known that physical activity reduces, while air pollution increases the risk of premature mortality.
“Physical activity amplifies respiratory intake and accumulation of air pollutants in our lungs, which may increase the harmful effects of air pollution during exercise.
“But despite the adverse effects of air pollution on health, air pollution should be not perceived as a barrier to exercise in urban areas.”
The researchers looked at 52,061 subjects, aged 50-65 years, from the two main cities Aarhus and Copenhagen, who participated in a larger study called Diet, Cancer and Health.
From 1993-97, they reported on their physical leisure activities, including sports, cycling to and from work and in their leisure time, gardening and walking.
The researchers then estimated air pollution levels from traffic at their residential addresses.
A total of 5,500 participants died before 2010, and the researchers observed about 20% fewer deaths among those who exercised than among those who didn’t exercise, even for those who lived in the most polluted areas, in central Copenhagen and Aarhus, or close to busy roads and highways.
The findings, published in the journal Environmental Health Perspectives, is the first large population-based, prospective cohort study that has examined the joint effects of both physical activity and air pollution on mortality. It is based on high quality data on both physical activity and air pollution exposure.
Associate Prof Andersen added: “Air pollution is often perceived as a barrier to exercise in urban areas. In the face of an increasing health burden due to rising physical inactivity and obesity in modern societies, our findings provide support for efforts in promoting exercise, even in urban areas with high pollution.
“However, we would still advise people to exercise and cycle in green areas, parks, woods, with low air pollution and away from busy roads, when possible.”
She added: “It is also important to note that these results pertain to Denmark and sites with similar air pollution levels, and may not necessary be true in cities with several fold higher air pollution levels, as seen in other parts of the world.”