Air pollution triggered by use of common chemicals, fuels may kill 10 times more people than previously recognized
Hundreds of thousands of people around the world die too soon every year because of exposure to air pollution caused by our daily use of chemical products and fuels, including paints, pesticides, charcoal and gases from vehicle tailpipes, according to a new CU Boulder-led study.
The new work, led by former CIRES postdoctoral researcher Benjamin Nault and CIRES Fellow Jose-Luis Jimenez, calculated that air pollution caused by “anthropogenic secondary organic aerosol” causes 340,000-900,000 premature deaths. Those are tiny particles in the atmosphere that form from chemicals emitted by human activities.
And “that’s more than 10 times as many deaths as previously estimated,” said Nault, who is now a scientist at Aerodyne Research, Inc. His work, published today in Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, builds on findings by CU Boulder, NOAA, NASA, and others that emissions from everyday products are increasingly important in forming pollutants in urban air.
“The older idea was that to reduce premature mortality, you should target coal-fired power plants or the transportation sector,” Nault said. “Yes, these are important, but we’re showing that if you’re not getting at the cleaning and painting products and other everyday chemicals, then you’re not getting at a major source.”
Atmospheric researchers have long understood that particles in the atmosphere small enough to be inhaled can damage people’s lungs and increase mortality. Studies have estimated that fine particle pollution, often called PM2.5, leads to 3-4 million premature deaths globally per year, possibly more.
Many countries, including the United States, therefore have laws limiting how many of those particles get into the atmosphere. We regulate soot from power plants and diesel exhaust, for example, which are “direct” sources of particulate matter. And regulations also target fossil fuel emissions of sulfur and nitrogen oxides, which can react in the atmosphere to form fine particles—an indirect, “secondary inorganic” source of particles.
The new work suggests that a third broad category of chemicals—anthropogenic secondary organic pollutants—is a significant indirect source of deadly fine particles.
To determine the mortality impact of several sources of fine particles, the team dug into data from 11 comprehensive air quality studies carried out in cities around the world in the last two decades. They drew on detailed databases of chemical emissions from cities including Beijing, London and New York City, and they ran those numbers through sophisticated air quality models that also incorporate satellite data.
They found that the production of secondary organic aerosol in those 11 cities was strongly correlated with specific organic compounds emitted by people’s activities. The chemicals at issue—called aromatics and intermediate- and semi-volatile organic compounds—are emitted from tailpipes and cooking fuels like wood and charcoal, and increasingly also from industrial solvents, house paints, cleaning products and other chemicals.
In previous work in Los Angeles, CIRES, NOAA and other scientists have reported that such volatile chemical products contribute as much as vehicles do to the formation of particle pollution. “What’s new here,” said co-author Brian McDonald, a NOAA scientist, “is that we are showing this is an issue in cities on three continents, North America, Europe and east Asia.”
Air quality regulations have tended to focus on volatile chemicals that produce ozone, another hazardous pollutant, said Jimenez, who is also a professor of chemistry at CU Boulder. But it is increasingly clear, most recently from the new work, that chemicals which contribute little to ozone formation may still contribute seriously to particle formation.
“Because this effect has been thought to be small, it hasn’t been targeted for control,” Jimenez said. “But when you take the atmospheric chemistry into account and put it into a model, you find that this particular source is killing a lot of people.”
Nault and Jimenez said they hope to expand their work to include more urban areas of the world, where there haven’t been enough measurements yet to confirm that volatile chemical products contribute substantially to fine particles. But the trend is holding so far in all places where there are enough measurements.
“If you care about air pollution impacts on health and mortality, you have to take this problem seriously,” Jimenez concluded.Particles from Paints, Pesticides Have Deadly Impact | CIRES
THE AIR WE BREATHE
Search this blog:
LOCAL AIR QUALITY
WHY WEAR A MASK?
KEY POINTS TO A MASKThree important points to look out for in an air pollution mask: Key Points to a Mask
TIME TO CHANGE YOUR FILTER?
- Air Pollution
- Air Quality
- Air Quality Index (AQI)
- Boris Johnson
- Carbon Dioxide CO2
- Carbon Monoxide CO
- Department for Environment Food and Rural Affairs (Defra)
- diesel exhaust fumes
- Environmental Protection Agency - EPA
- EU - European Union
- European Environment Agency (EEA)
- forest fire
- ground level ozone
- Health Effects of Air Pollution
- Hong Kong
- King's College London
- London Mayor
- Los Angeles
- New Delhi
- Nitrogen Dioxide NO2
- Nitrogen Oxide NO
- Ozone O3
- PM - Particulate Matter
- Respro® Masks FAQ
- Respro® Products
- Sadiq Khan
- Sulfur Dioxide SO2
- U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
- Ultra Low Emission Zone (ULEZ)
- vehicle emissions
- wood burning
- World Heath Organization (WHO)
AIR POLLUTION NEWS
- Air Quality (3,219)
- Health Effects of Air Pollution (729)
- Help & FAQs (6)
- Respro® Products (81)
- Sports (38)
- World News (2,638)
- Africa (81)
- Asia (900)
- Australia & Oceania (82)
- Europe (1,061)
- Latin America (86)
- Middle East (124)
- USA & Canada (489)