Alberta wildfire smoke making its way into Saskatchewan 

Smoke from the raging fire in Fort McMurray has moved into Saskatchewan, producing low visibility in some areas.

Environment Canada issued special air quality statements for parts of the province, saying northwest winds are spreading smoke from wildfires in northeast Alberta into portions of western and central Saskatchewan.

As of 7 p.m. Thursday, the following areas were at risk.

  • Cluff Lake Mine
  • La Loche and Clearwater River Prov. Park
  • Buffalo Narrows and Peter Pond Lake
  • Île à la Crosse and Beauval
  • Green Lake
  • R.M. of Beaver River including Pierceland and Goodsoil
  • R.M. of Big River including Big River and Chitek Lake
  • R.M. of Loon Lake including Loon Lake and Makwa
  • R.M. of Meadow Lake including Waterhen Res.

The statement said smoke near the ground is causing very high health risk conditions.

The agency warns people might experience symptoms such as increased coughing, headaches or shortness of breath.

Those most at risk include children, seniors, and those with cardiovascular or lung disease, such as asthma and COPD.

Environment Canada encourages people to check local weather forecasts and alerts in the coming days to know when extra care will be needed.

Saskatoon and Regina are noted as being at moderate risk for impacted air quality.

Meteorologist John Paul Cragg said winds will bring the smoke into southern Saskatchewan near Saskatoon Thursday afternoon and push it to Regina by the end of Friday.

“By the time it makes it to Saskatoon, it looks like it will have dissipated enough that it won’t cause a lot of air quality issues,” he said.

Skies in Saskatoon will be hazy and it is still recommended that people with lung diseases or extreme breathing problems check Environment Canada before heading outside.

Source: Alberta wildfire smoke making its way into Saskatchewan | News Talk 650 CKOM

Posted in Air Quality, USA & Canada | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Canadian wildfire smoke on course to reach Minnesota by Thursday

Smoke from a wildfire rises in the air as cars line up on a road in Fort McMurray, Alberta, Tuesday, May 3, 2016. At least half of a northern Alberta city was ordered evacuated Tuesday as a wildfire whipped by winds engulfed homes and sent ash raining down on residents.

Smoke from a massive wildfire in Alberta is at Minnesota’s doorstep, meaning the dimmer switch on the sun will be dialed down a touch come Thursday.

The wildfire has been burning since Sunday, some 1,400 miles to the northwest of the Twin Cities in and around Fort McMurray, forcing tens of thousands of Canadians to flee their charred neighborhoods.

Drifting smoke already hovers over much of North Dakota.

Next in line is Minnesota, according to the National Weather Service in Chanhassen.

“You can see it drifting in to northern Minnesota later tonight,” based on the Weather Service’s computer models, said meteorologist Michelle Margraf.

By Thursday, much of Minnesota will be under a smoky blanket, but the tangible impact should be limited.

“A dimming of the sun slightly,” Margraf said, “that’s primarily what we’re looking at.”

“It won’t linger for days and days,” Margraf added, and it should dissipate by Friday.

Because the smoke is expected to stick to the higher elevations of the atmosphere, officials said, people likely won’t notice any health or odor issues.

Steve Mikkelson, spokesman for the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, said, “There are no indications yet” that the air folks in Minnesota breathe will be affected, “but that could change from day to day.”

Source: Canadian wildfire smoke on course to reach Minnesota by Thursday – StarTribune.com

Posted in Air Quality, USA & Canada | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Air pollution warnings issued as UK temperatures set to soar 

Hot weekend means people with lung or heart problems should avoid outdoor strenuous activity, warns Defra

The government has issued air pollution warnings as temperatures are set to climb towards 27C (more than 80F) in south-east England and the Midlands on Sunday.

The warm weather, which threatens to be hotter than in parts of the Mediterranean, may be accompanied by moderate air pollution, with some local hotspots. Small areas in south-west England and western Scotland could be at higher risk by Sunday.

Defra, the department responsible for official pollution warnings, said those with lung or heart problems who experience symptoms should consider avoiding strenuous activity, particularly outdoors.

A Defra spokesman said: “Strong south-easterly winds blowing in air from the continent could lead to moderate levels of pollution on Thursday and over the weekend in parts of England and Wales. Levels are expected to fall after the weekend.

“This does tend to happen during the change in the temperature around spring time.” Defra said air pollution can cause long- and short-term health problems for those with heart, lung and other breathing conditions.

The Met Office says rain, mainly in northwestern areas leading up to the weekend, could also become more widespread as temperatures rise, with thundery showers in areas such as the east Midlands.

“It is going to be difficult to predict because showers can develop quite quickly in almost any area,” said forecaster Grahame Madge. By Sunday temperatures over 25C are possible. “It will feel a very warm day, particularly as April was relatively cold, so people will notice the contrast.”

Temperatures were likely to be highest in the south-east away from the coast, but they would not be anywhere near May records. These reached 32.8C in a number of places including Regent’s Park in London and Tunbridge Wells on 29 May 1944, just over a week before D-Day.

Source: Air pollution warnings issued as UK temperatures set to soar | UK news | The Guardian

Posted in Air Quality, Europe, London, UK | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Polluted air may up risk of many cancers

For elderly people in Hong Kong, long term exposure to fine-particle air pollution is tied to an increased risk of dying from many cancers, including breast, liver and pancreatic cancer, in addition to the expected lung cancer risk, according to a new study.

“We assumed a number of sites would be affected, but outside of the expected lung and upper GI cancers, we were unsure which cancers would show an association, so this really helps highlight the breadth of involvement of particulates in the development of cancer,” said co-lead author G. Neil Thomas, from the Institute of Applied Health of the College of Medical and Dental Sciences at The University of Birmingham in the UK.

Ultrafine particles can pass into the blood stream and have the potential to impact any part of the body, Thomas told Reuters Health by email.

The researchers began following more than 66,000 people age 65 and older in Hong Kong between 1998 and 2001 and tracked them through 2011. They used satellite data and site monitors to estimate fine particulate matter in the air at the subjects’ homes.

They focused on fine particulate matter, or PM2.5, which is produced by motor vehicles, power plants and other industrial combustion, according to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.

After accounting for smoking status, the researchers found that as a subject’s home exposure to fine particles in the air increased, so did the risk of dying from any cancer, including cancer of the upper digestive tract, liver, bile ducts, gall bladder and pancreas.

As fine particulate concentrations increased by 10 micrograms per cubic meter, a woman’s risk of dying from breast cancer increased by 80 percent, while a man’s risk of dying from lung cancer increased by 36 percent, according to a report released by the journal Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention.

“Biologically there is no reason to suggestion such observations wouldn’t apply to younger people,” Thomas said. “It is important though to remember that cancers are chronic diseases and thus it takes years between the exposure to the particulates to the development of a diagnosable cancer.”

Data from other populations and countries has been similar, he said.

According to the Clean Air Act in the U.S., the average annual concentration of fine particulate matter in the air should be 15 micrograms per cubic meter or lower. In Hong Kong, average annual particulate matter should not exceed 35 micrograms per cubic meter according to the Air Pollution Control Ordinance.

“In Hong Kong the PM2.5 concentrations are not comparable to those in North America or Europe,” said Giulia Cesaroni of the epidemiology department of the Regional Health Service of the Lazio Region in Rome, Italy, who was not part of the new study. “The (World Health Organization) suggested a limit value of 10 micrograms per cubic meter for PM2.5, and study participants are exposed to a mean value of 34 micrograms per cubic meter.”

“However, associations between air pollution and cancer risk have been found in other settings at low concentrations,” Cesaroni said.

The EPA provides air quality index forecasts for the U.S. at airnow.gov.

Particulate matter can cause cancer because it often contains toxic chemicals and causes inflammation, among other mechanisms, Cesaroni told Reuters Health by email.

“At an individual level the strongest risk factors for cancer are smoking and diet,” she said. “However, at a population level, given the wide distribution of exposure, even a small increase in risk can result in a large number of cases.”

Pollution also increases the risk of cardiorespiratory disease, Thomas said.

“The risk is not as great as that from smoking tobacco (and quitting greatly improves health of those smoking and those exposed to the second hand smoke) but is clearly present,” he said.

Source: Polluted air may up risk of many cancers | Reuters

Posted in Air Quality, Health Effects of Air Pollution | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

World Asthma Day 2016: Why We Need To Reduce Air Pollution, Environmental Toxins More Than Ever

Asthma rates have only increased in recent decades, and air pollution may be one of the culprits.

Asthma rates have increased significantly in recent decades, with the number of people diagnosed with asthma in the United States growing 4.3 million between 2001 and 2009. In some cases, the rise could be a result of overdiagnosis; it could also be partially explained by what experts call the “hygiene hypothesis,” which says today’s children aren’t exposed to enough dirt or germs to condition their immune systems.

Regardless of the cause, the rates are high: Some 17.7 million adults in the U.S. have asthma (7.4 percent of the adult population), as do 6.3 million children (8.6 percent of the child population), according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). And the one thing that has consistently been associated with increased rates of asthma (and other health issues) is pollution — whether in the air or water sources. On World Asthma Day 2016, which falls on May 3, let’s remember that fighting one of the roots of the problem may prevent future asthma diagnoses.

The Clean Air Acts enacted in the 70s and 90s had a positive impact on U.S. air pollution, reducing carbon monoxide, nitrogen oxide, and sulfur dioxide emissions by nearly half decades later. But as highlighted by the recent water crisis in Flint, or the unusually high air pollution levels in Detroit, the U.S. isn’t as safe as we might expect. Low-income and minority communities in places like Detroit and Flint, in particular, are often at highest risk of environmental toxin exposure, making their inhabitants more likely to develop chronic health conditions like asthma, ADHD, stroke, chronic stress, and neurological disorders.

That’s because pollution can actually change your genes. Constant exposure to environmental toxins modifies genes, and causes lung damage or asthma to be passed on to next generations. Babies in Fresno, Calif. (the most polluted city in the U.S.) and Detroit are often born with asthma and other pollution-related health issues. And pregnant women who are exposed to air pollution may give birth to babies with asthma or other health problems.

Of course, as asthma rates increase, so do the number of new asthma treatments. In a recent study, researchers developed a new method to prevent asthma and allergies by sneaking allergens into the body inside biodegradable nanoparticles. These hidden allergens wouldn’t cause the immune system to react against them, but instead would condition it to recognize it as a normal visitor and not a foreign agent. But new medical treatments and technologies still don’t solve the root issue of air pollution.

If we’re able to reduce air pollution and environmental toxin exposure, it’s likely that the rates of asthma, respiratory illnesses, and other health issues among children in poverty and U.S. adults in general will decrease. A recent study found that a 47 percent reduction in ambient air pollution resulted in a 32 percent decrease in bronchitis symptoms among kids with asthma, hinting that we can make a difference. On World Asthma Day, let’s be aware of the impact humans have on the environment, and know that we have to work together in order to reduce it. Otherwise, our health will suffer for generations to come.

Source: World Asthma Day 2016: Why We Need To Reduce Air Pollution, Environmental Toxins More Than Ever

Posted in Air Quality, Asthma, Health Effects of Air Pollution, USA & Canada | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Mexico City bans 40 per cent of cars again over air pollution 

The new rules keep one-in-five cars off the road every day, but the alert issued yesterday will double the ban on today.

Mexico City officials issued a new air pollution alert, meaning that 40 per cent of vehicles will be banned today, while industries will be required to cut emissions. Smog in the megacity of more than 20 million people worsened in March, prompting authorities to issue the first alerts in a decade and impose new traffic restrictions through June. The new rules keep one-in-five cars off the road every day, but the alert issued yesterday will double the ban on today. Some 5.5 million vehicles circulate on normal days. The Environmental Commission of the Megalopolis, which includes authorities from the capital and surrounding states, also ordered cement, chemical, pharmaceutical, oil and power companies to reduce emissions by as much as 40 per cent.

The alarm was raised after ozone levels reached 161 points, above the 150 level. The threshold was lowered from 190 to 150 last month. Before the new air quality alert was issued, the environmental prosecutor’s office (Profepa) warned that it may shut down and fine five companies that did not allow authorities to check their emissions during a pollution emergency in the greater Mexico City area in March. Three of the companies are subsidiaries of US firms, while one is based on Canada.

Source: Mexico City bans 40 per cent of cars again over air pollution | The Indian Express

Posted in Air Quality, Latin America, Mexico | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

What causes air pollution?

Carbon dioxide in Earth’s atmosphere if half of global-warming emissions are not absorbed. Credit: NASA/JPL/GSFC

By definition, pollution refers to any matter that is “out of place”. In other words, it is what happens when toxins, contaminants, and other harmful products are introduced into an environment, disrupting its normal patterns and functions. When it comes to our atmosphere, pollution refers to the introduction of chemicals, particulates, and biological matter that can be harmful to humans, plants and animals, and cause damage to the natural environment.

Whereas some causes of pollution are entirely natural – being the result of sudden changes in temperature, seasonal changes, or regular cycles – others are the result of human impact (i.e. anthropogenic, or man-made). More and more, the effects of air pollution on our planet, especially those that result from human activity, are of great concern to developers, planners and environmental organizations, given the long-term effect they can have.

By composition, Earth’s atmosphere is made up of nitrogen gas (78%), oxygen gas (21%), and other trace gases (such as argon and carbon dioxide). This balance is essential to all life here on Earth, so the introduction of pollutants can have a profound and damaging effect. All told, pollution can take many forms, like carbon compounds such as carbon monoxide (CO) and carbon dioxide (CO²). sulfuric compounds like sulfur dioxide (SO²), methane, radioactive decay, or toxic chemicals.

In addition, air pollution can be divided into Primary and Secondary types of pollutants. Whereas primary pollutants are caused by primary sources – i.e. the direct result of processes (such as industrial emissions or volcanic eruptions ) – secondary pollutants are the results of intermingling and reactions by primary pollutants (such as carbon emissions and water vapor, which creates smog).

Natural Causes:

Natural forms of pollution are those that result from naturally-occurring phenomena. This means they are caused by periodic activities that are not man-made or the result of human activity. What’s more, these sources of pollution are subject to natural cycles, being more common under certain conditions and less common under others. Being part of Earth’s natural climatic variations also means that they are sustainable over long periods of time.

Dust and Wildfires:

In large areas of open land that have little to no vegetation, and are particularly dry due to a lack of precipitation, wind can naturally create dust storms. This particulate matter, when added to the air, can have a natural warming effect and can also be a health hazard for living creatures. Particulate matter, when scattered into regions that have natural vegetation, can also be a natural impediment to photosynthesis.

Wildfires are a natural occurrence in wooded areas when prolonged dry periods occur, generally as a result of season changes and a lack of precipitation. The smoke and carbon monoxide caused by these fires contribute to carbon levels in the atmosphere, which allows for greater warming by causing a Greenhouse Effect.

Animal and Vegetation:

Animal digestion (particularly by cattle) is another cause of natural air pollution, leading to the release of methane, another greenhouse gas. In some regions of the world, vegetation – such as black gum, poplar, oak, and willow trees – emits significant amounts of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) on warmer days. These react with primary anthropogenic pollutants – specifically nitrogen oxides, sulfur dioxide and carbon compounds – to produce low-lying seasonal hazes that are rich in ozone.

Volcanic Activity:

Volcanic eruptions are a major source of natural air pollution. When an eruption occurs, it produces tremendous amounts of sulfuric, chlorine, and ash products, which are released into the atmosphere and can be picked up by winds to be dispersed over large areas. Additionally, compounds like sulfur dioxide and volcanic ash have been known to have a natural cooling effect, due to their ability to reflect solar radiation.

Anthropogenic Causes:

But by far the greatest contributing to air pollution today are those that are a result of human impact – i.e. man-made causes. These are largely the result of human reliance on fossil fuels and heavy industry, but can also be due to the accumulation of waste, modern agriculture, and other man-made processes.

Fossil-Fuel Emissions:

The combustion of fossil fuels like coal, petroleum and other factory combustibles is a major cause of air pollution. These are generally used in power plants, manufacturing facilities (factories) and waste incinerators, as well as furnaces and other types of fuel-burning heating devices. Providing air conditioning and other services also requires significant amounts of electricity, which in turn leads to more emissions.

According to the Union of Concerned Scientists, industry accounts for 21% of greenhouse gas emissions in the US, while electricity generation accounted for another 31%. Meanwhile, emissions caused by gasoline-burning vehicles – i.e. CO, CO², nitrogen oxides, particulates and water vapor – are also a significant source of air pollution.

A study conducted by the UCS in 2013 showed that transportation accounted for more than half of the carbon monoxide and nitrogen oxides, and almost a quarter of the hydrocarbons emitted into the air in the US. Globally, the situation is similar, with minor variations according to sector. According to the IPCC Fifth Assessment Report (2014), industry accounted for 21% of total greenhouse gas emissions, electricity and heat production for another 25%, and transportation accounted for 14%.

Agriculture and Animal Husbandry:

Greenhouse gas emissions from agriculture (aka. the cultivation of crops and livestock) is created by a combination of factors, one is the production of methane by cattle. Another cause is deforestation, where the need for pastureland and growing fields requires the removal of trees that would otherwise sequester carbon and clean the air.

According to the IPCC Fifth Assessment Report, agriculture accounts for 24% of annual emissions. However, this estimate does not include the CO2 that ecosystems remove from the atmosphere by sequestering carbon in biomass, dead organic matter and soils, which offset approximately 20% of emissions from this sector.

Waste:

Landfills are also known to generate methane, which is not only a major greenhouse gas, but also an asphyxiant and highly flammable and potentially hazardous if a landfills grow unchecked. Population growth and urbanization have a proportional relationship with the production of waste, which in turn leads to greater demand for dumping grounds that are far removed from urban environments. These locations thus became a significant source of methane production.

For some time, environmental scientists have been aware that the Earth has several self-regulating mechanisms. When it comes to the Earth’s atmosphere, these mechanisms allow for the sequestration of carbon and other pollutants, ensuring that the balance of its ecosystem remains unaffected. Unfortunately, the growing impact humanity has had on the planet is threatening to permanently alter that balance.

Basically, we are adding pollutants to the air (as well as the oceans and land masses) faster than the Earth’s natural mechanisms can remove them. Ad the results of this are being felt in terms of acid rain, smog, global warming, and a number of health problems that can be directly attributed to exposure to these harmful pollutants. If we intend to go on living on planet Earth, then sustainability and less pollution need to be our goals!


Source:
What causes air pollution?

Posted in Air Quality | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Exposure to particulate air pollutants associated with numerous types of cancer 

In 2015, the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) published a series of monographs on the evaluation of various carcinogenic risks. In a monograph on air pollution, the organization pointed out the difficulty of assessing the effects of pollution on multiple types of cancers, given their different etiologies, risk factors and variability in the composition of air pollutants in space and time. However, the IARC identified certain key components of air pollution, including particulates.

How the Study Was Conducted: Thach, Thomas and colleagues enrolled 66,280 people who were age 65 or older when initially recruited between 1998 and 2001. The researchers did not have data on whether they had cancer before they were enrolled. Researchers followed the study subjects until 2011, ascertaining causes of death from Hong Kong registrations. Annual concentrations of ambient fine particulate matter, or matter with an aerodynamic diameter of less than 2.5 micrometers (PM2.5), at their homes were estimated using data from satellite data and fixed-site monitors. Researchers adjusted for smoking status and excluded deaths that had occurred within three years of the baseline to control for competing diseases.

Results: The study showed that for every 10 microgram per cubic meter (µg/m3) of increased exposure to PM2.5, the risk of dying from any cancer rose by 22 percent. Increases of 10 µg/m3 of PM2.5 were associated with a 42 percent increased risk of mortality from cancer in the upper digestive tract and a 35 percent increased risk of mortality from accessory digestive organs, which include the liver, bile ducts, gall bladder, and pancreas.

For women, every 10 µg/m3 increase in exposure to PM2.5 was associated with an 80 percent increased risk of mortality from breast cancer, and men experienced a 36 percent increased risk of dying of lung cancer for every 10 µg/m3 increased exposure to PM2.5.

Author Comment: Thach and Thomas indicated possible explanations for the association between PM2.5 and cancer could include defects in DNA repair function, alterations in the body’s immune response, or inflammation that triggers angiogenesis, the growth of new blood vessels that allows tumors to spread. In the case of the digestive organs, heavy metal pollution could affect gut microbiata and influence the development of cancer, the authors added.

While further research would be required to determine whether other countries experience similar associations between PM2.5 and cancer deaths, Thomas said this study, combined with existing research, suggests that other urban populations may carry the same risks.

“The implications for other similar cities around the world are that PM2.5 must be reduced as much and as fast as possible,” he said. “Air pollution remains a clear, modifiable public health concern.”

The authors added that the large scale of their study, as well as its documentation of cancer-specific mortality, adds to the IARC’s report on the contribution of particulate matter to various cancers.

Study Limitations: Thach said a limitation of the study is that it focused solely on PM2.5. He said emerging research is beginning to study the effects of exposure to multiple pollutants on human health. He also cautioned that pollution is just one risk factor for cancer, and others, such as diet and exercise, may be more significant and more modifiable risk factors.

Source: Exposure to particulate air pollutants associated with numerous types of cancer | EurekAlert! Science News

Posted in Air Quality, Health Effects of Air Pollution, Medical Studies | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment