Key Points to a Mask

 Screen Shot 2015-02-13 at 07.41.06Screen Shot 2015-02-13 at 07.41.50Screen Shot 2015-02-13 at 07.42.30

POINT 1 – Does it seal effectively?

 The single most important point:

For a mask to work properly, it has to seal the area of nose and mouth from the external environment. The inhaled air has to pass through the filter material in order to remove pollution by physically trapping or adsorbing (different from absorption) gas or vapour molecules. A nose clip of some fashion, usually a strip of aluminium to bend between the bridge of the nose and the cheekbone is a vital component required to assist in making an effective seal.

Failure to create an effective seal will allow unfiltered air to pass around the sides of the mask and into the respiratory system. This is known as Inward Leakage.

A ‘one size fits all’ mask will invariably offer a poor fit and an ineffective seal and will place the mask squarely in the useless product bin. Like shoe sizing, one size does not fit all.

POINT 2 – Is the filter material up to spec?

Filter materials come in two categories:

The first is the ability to remove particulate matter. Typically that would be diesel particulates and pollen. The type of filter is usually a non-woven material made from zillions of fibres bonded together. They are electrostatically charged, both positively and negatively (like combing your hair makes a charge), so that particles, which are passing through the filter structure, are attracted and physically held in the matrix of the material. The smaller the particle, the greater the attractive force, which means that materials which are electrostatically charged can readily trap fine respirable dusts that over populate the air in our towns and cities.

Having first been developed by the Defence Establishment in the UK, these types of filter materials are not cheap. So if you are purchasing a product which appears to be ‘cheap’ and it says ‘removes particles down to 0.3 microns’, then the chances are that it might stop one or two particles but not the millions that are actually passing through. Watch out! If the material cannot be backed up by industrial test data then it probably doesn’t do the job effectively.

The second type of filter is Activated Charcoal material. It has the ability to filter (adsorb) gases and vapours. Well, like everything, if it’s cheap, then the chances are that the material is either black cloth appearing to look like Activated Charcoal (Far Eastern copy products are known for this) or a cloth that is impregnated with carbon powder. There is a big difference between the filtering capacity of a carbon powder glued to a carrier material and Activated Charcoal Cloth (D.A.C.C) that is 100% Activated Charcoal.

Carbon powder impregnated cloths are used in the industry for cheap nuisance odour type products, like ‘odour eaters’ ; you know the things you put in your husband/wife or girlfriend/boyfriend’s trainers/shoes because his/her trainers stink after a while. These are good for air that is not moving i.e. static air, but of little use when air is travelling like when you are inhaling air into your lungs. For urban pollution, the best  material  to use would be what’s known as DACC (Dynamic Activated Charcoal Cloth). This material is 100% Activated Charcoal Cloth, which can absorb gases and vapours on a molecular level and very quickly too. It is manufactured under licence and is another decedent of the UK Defence Establishment. It has been tested on a range of gases and vapours that are listed on our website.

POINT 3 – Comfort

The ideal mask would be one that you forget that you have it on:

The comfort goal here is to ensure that you can forget that you are wearing a mask. It is possible like a pair of socks on your feet, you forget that you have the socks on.  The same applies in our demand for comfort.

Exhaled breath contains three components that are not good to re-inhale and only increase discomfort. On exhalation, heat, water vapour and carbon dioxide are all produced and need to be expelled before inhaling again. So rather than these components passing through the filter, it is best to channel them out through exhalation valves. These are valves that open one way only. They close automatically when you inhale and open when you exhale. They are simple but effective parts of a mask and do not need to be replaced. The reason why we want the air to travel out through the valves is so they don’t saturate the filter with water vapour as it makes it harder to breathe in again and the relative back pressure of the speed of exhaled air including heat and water vapour, will hit you back in the nose and mouth area like hot air when getting off a plane at an airport in a really hot climate.

Comfort is important and if the mask is not comfortable for the duration of your journey you probably will give up on it. So choose your mask with the following points in mind:

1.     The correct filtration for the environment you want to use the mask

2.     The right size for your face size and shape

3.     The right valves for the amount of work you are doing, sitting on a couch does not require valves; belting through the City on a bike does!

4.     Correct fitting to ensure you can breathe unimpeded through the nose and or the mouth.

Posted in Air Quality | Tagged | Leave a comment

Stuttgart, München, Hamburg – Die schmutzigste Luft Deutschlands

Zu viel Feinstaub in Stuttgart, zu hohe Stickoxid-Werte in München: In vielen deutschen Städten werden die gesetzlichen Grenzwerte überschritten. Wo ist die Luft besonders dreckig? Der Überblick.

Dreckige Luft schadet der Gesundheit – sie kann auf Dauer sogar tödlich sein, deshalb gibt es gesetzliche Grenzwerte. Beispielsweise darf ein Kubikmeter Luft maximal 40 Mikrogramm Feinstaub bis zu einer Partikelgröße von zehn Mikrometern enthalten.

Doch Grenzwerte für Luftschadstoffe werden vielerorts nicht eingehalten, wie eine Anfrage von Bündnis 90/Die Grünen an die Bundesregierung ergab. “Die Umwelt- und Gesundheitsbelastung ist vielerorts verheerend”, sagte der Bundestagsabgeordnete Peter Meiwald. Offensichtlich versagten die Regelungen des Bundes an zahlreichen Stellen.

Die Abgeordneten wollten von der Bundesregierung die 15 Orte mit den höchsten gemessenen Schadstoffkonzentrationen erfahren. Dabei ging es unter anderem um Feinstaub und Ozon. Die folgende Karte zeigt die Lage der Messstationen mit den deutschlandweit höchsten Schadstoffkonzentrationen. Dabei geht es um PM10 (Feinstaub bis zu zehn Mikrometer Durchmesser), Stickstoffdioxid und Schwefeldioxid. Gemessen wird praktisch immer an Hauptverkehrsstraßen, weil dort die Belastung am höchsten ist.

Screen Shot 2015-04-27 at 09.14.02

Beim Feinstaub gab es sieben Gemeinden, die den Grenzwert für PM10 überschritten. Die PM10-Werte dürfen laut Gesetz nur an maximal 35 Tagen im Jahr über 50 Mikrogramm pro Kubikmeter liegen. Den höchsten Wert hatte die Messstation Am Neckartor in Stuttgart (91 Tage). In Stuttgart werden schon seit Jahren immer wieder die Limits überschritten. Wegen der Kessellage konzentrieren sich dort die Schadstoffe. Dann folgen Reutlingen (79 Tage, Lederstraße), Tübingen (46 Tage, Mühlstraße) und Gelsenkirchen (45, Kurt-Schumacher-Str.). Auch Leipzig (41) hält den Grenzwert für Feinstaub in der Lützner Straße nicht ein. Eine detaillierte Übersicht über die Messstationen mit den höchsten Schadstoffkonzentrationen finden Sie in der 24-seitigen Antwort der Bundesregierung.

Screen Shot 2015-04-27 at 09.15.32

“Erschreckend ist, an wie vielen Messstellen die Grenzwerte überschritten werden”, sagte die Grünen-Politikerin Bärbel Höhn. In fast jedem Bundesland gebe es kritische Regionen. Mitunter ist aber auch nur eine viel befahrene Straße das Problem, wie etwa die Mühlstraße in Tübingen. Dort erreicht der Feinstaub dann bedenkliche Konzentrationen, während die Werte im übrigen Stadtgebiet den gesetzlichen Vorschriften genügen. Doch selbst wenn die Grenzwerte in einer Gemeinde nur punktuell überschritten werden – diese Bereiche sind meist auch jene, die von besonders vielen Menschen frequentiert werden, die damit ungesunder Luft ausgesetzt sind.

Screen Shot 2015-04-27 at 09.16.51

Hauptverursacher der hohen Feinstaubwerte ist der Autoverkehr – dabei insbesondere Dieselmotoren. PM10-Stäube dringen bis in die Nasenhöhle ein und können beispielsweise die Schleimhäute reizen. Noch kleiner Partikel der Größe PM2,5 schaffen es bis in die Lunge und können die Blutgefäße schädigen oder Krebs verursachen. Laut einer Studie der Europäischen Umweltagentur (EUA) verursacht Feinstaub pro Jahr etwa 430.000 vorzeitige Todesfälle in der EU.

Stickstoffdioxid (NO2) entsteht ebenfalls bei Verbrennungsprozessen. Wichtigste Emittenten in deutschen Gemeinden sind Autos mit Dieselmotor. NO2 ist vor allem für Asthmatiker problematisch. Bei zu hohen Konzentrationen steigt das Risiko für Schlaganfälle. Der Jahresgrenzwert liegt bei 40 µg/m3. Da Abgas auch Blätter schädigt, gilt laut Umweltbundesamt bereits ein Wert von 30 µg/m3 als kritisch für Pflanzen.

Die höchsten Werte wurden in Stuttgart und München gemessen – unter den Top 15 sind aber auch Straßen in Berlin, Hamburg und Köln. Überall dort waren die NO2-Werte oberhalb des gesetzlichen Limits von 40.

Screen Shot 2015-04-27 at 09.17.32

Jürgen Resch, Geschäftsführer der Deutschen Umwelthilfe, fordert entschlossene Schritte der Bundesregierung gegen Feinstaub und Stickoxide. “Andere Länder machen vor, wie das geht”, sagt er. In der Schweiz müssten alle Baufahrzeuge und Lokomotiven zwangsweise mit Partikelfiltern ausgerüstet sein – hierzulande bestehe keine solche Pflicht. Auch an Busse stellten Städte wie Madrid oder Stockholm deutlich höhere Forderungen.

Ein großes Problem sind laut Resch auch neue Dieselfahrzeuge. “Die erfüllen nur auf dem Prüfstand die Abgasnorm”, im Alltagsbetrieb sei der Ausstoß an Feinstaub und NO2 um ein Vielfaches höher. Kurzfristig könne man die Situation nur mit Fahrverboten verbessern. Die Luftreinhaltepläne vieler Städte reichten dafür kaum aus.

Grenzwertüberschreitungen gab es auch bei Ozon, das der Lunge schaden kann. Betroffen sind unter anderem Oberwiesenthal, Münster im Schwarzwald und Gersfeld in der Rhön.

Es gibt jedoch auch eine gute Nachricht: Laut Auskunft der Bundesregierung werden die Grenzwerte für Schwefeldioxid (SO2) heute an keiner Messstation in Deutschland mehr überschritten. SO2 wird beim Verbrennen von Kohle und Öl freigesetzt. Es reizt Schleimhäute und Augen. SO2 war in den Achtzigerjahren auch mitverantwortlich für den sauren Regen. Das Abgas war vor allem in der einstigen DDR ein großes Problem, weil vielerorts schwefelhaltige Kohle verbrannt wurde.

Glücklicherweise ist die SO2-Belastung in den vergangenen 20 Jahren aber deutlich gesunken. Die höchsten Werte werden heute im Erzgebirge, Hamburg, Duisburg und Bottrop gemessen. Gesundheitsprobleme sind dadurch nach Auskunft des Umweltbundesamts nicht zu befürchten.

Screen Shot 2015-04-27 at 09.18.20

 

via Stuttgart, München, Hamburg – Die schmutzigste Luft Deutschlands – SPIEGEL ONLINE.

Posted in Air Quality, Europe, Germany | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

National Park Service urges Utah to crack down on pollution

The National Park Service is pressing Utah environmental regulars to crack down on emissions at two coal-fired power plants to improve air quality and views in the state’s five national parks.

Haze mars vistas at the parks about three-fourths of the time in violation of federal regulations mandating upgrades at the nation’s dirtiest power plants to protect their air quality, the park service wrote in April 2 letters to the Utah Department of Environmental Quality and U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.

The park service wants the state to require further reductions in nitrogen-oxide emissions at two coal-fired power plants in central Utah through installation of retrofit technology known as selective catalytic reduction.

But the Utah Division of Air Quality would not take the step under proposed revisions to its plan to combat regional haze, The Salt Lake Tribune reported (http://bit.ly/1E9BEaR ).

“The state clearly values the importance of the five national parks in Utah and actively promotes national tourism, yet at the same time it appears unprepared to fulfill its legal requirements under the Clean Air Act and associated regulations to protect and enhance the very scenic views that attract millions of visitors to the parks every year,” wrote Tammy Whittington, associate regional park service director.

Utah’s air quality division maintains $588 million in past upgrades and the recent shutdown of Rocky Mountain Power’s aging Carbon Power Plant help the state meet regional haze standards.

Rocky Mountain Power contends retrofits to its Hunter and Huntington power stations in Emery County would be cost prohibitive.

“You’re talking in excess of $170 million per unit. They are custom retrofits; the actual cost would vary per unit. You get a better result by the work already done at Hunter and Huntington and the Carbon closure than the regional haze rules requires,” Rocky Mountain Power spokesman Dave Eskelsen told The Tribune.

“If you add” selective catalytic reduction “to those units, you get a substantial expense to consumers with a marginal benefit to the regional haze quality,” he added.

Selective catalytic reduction retrofits would reduce Hunter and Huntington nitrogen-oxide emissions by 14,700 tons, or 86 percent, according to environmental groups.

Last year, the EPA rejected portions of Utah’s regional haze plan, and environmentalists say the state’s revised plan is not much different.

“They keep delaying and delaying and re-proposing the same plan,” Cory MacNulty of the National Parks Conservation Association said. “We have to have reductions that go much deeper than this plan to clean the air over our parks.”

via National Park Service urges Utah to crack down on pollution – San Francisco Chronicle.

Posted in Air Quality, USA & Canada | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Smog Alert program changes name to Air Quality Advisory

The Southwest Ohio Air Quality Agency in partnership with OKI Regional Council of Governments changed the name of the Smog Alert program to Air Quality Advisory.

An Air Quality Advisory is a public message that is issued the day before the Southwest Ohio Air Quality Agency expects to see levels of air pollution that are unhealthy for sensitive groups such as children, the elderly and people with asthma, bronchitis and other respiratory problems, according to a press release. When issued, advisories are for Butler, Clermont, Hamilton and Warren counties in Ohio and Boone, Campbell and Kenton counties in Kentucky.

Levels of six main air pollutants are monitored to determine the region’s air quality as it relates to a series of health-based standards. For each of these pollutants, the U.S. EPA has established national air quality standards to protect public health.

Precautions everyone can take to help reduce air pollution:

•Taking the bus, carpooling, biking or walking instead of driving.

•Refueling your vehicle after 8 p.m.; do not top off when refueling and tighten the gas cap.

•Not idling your vehicle.

•Combining trips or eliminating unnecessary vehicle trips.

•Keeping your vehicle maintained with properly inflated tires and timely oil changes.

•Avoiding use of gasoline-powered lawn equipment on Air Quality Advisory days.

•Avoiding use of oil-based paints and stains on Air Quality Advisory days.

•Never burning leaves or other yard trimmings.

•Always burning clean, seasoned wood in outdoor fire pits, fireplaces and wood stoves.

•Not using fire pits or fireplaces for non-essential home heating on Air Quality Advisory days.

•Conserving electricity.

via Smog Alert program changes name to Air Quality Advisory.

Posted in Air Quality, USA & Canada | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Air pollution ‘can shrink middle-aged brains’

Middle-aged and older adults who breathe polluted air in towns and cities can be at increased risk of dementia and strokes, researchers have warned.

Normal pollution levels – fine particles from traffic fumes, factory and power station emissions and wood fire smoke – in major cities caused hidden brain strokes while shrinking the brain by the equivalent of one year’s worth of ageing, they said.
This “fine particulate matter” with a diameter of 2.5 millionth of a metre, known as PM2.5, travels deep into the lungs and previous research has linked it to strokes and heart attacks.

Now a new study has shown long-term exposure to these airborne pollutants can cause damage to brain structures and impair thinking and memory abilities in middle-aged and older adults.

It found evidence of smaller brain structure and a type of 
“silent” ischemic stroke, resulting from a blockage in the blood vessels supplying the brain, in more than 900 patients taking part in a heart study.

Researchers looked at how far the patients aged over 60 who did not have a stroke or dementia lived from busy roads.

They then used satellite images to assess prolonged exposure to ambient PM2.5.

Dr Elissa Wilker, a researcher in the cardiovascular epidemiology research unit at the Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Centre in Boston in the US, said: “This is one of the first studies to look at the relationship between ambient air pollution and brain structure. Our findings suggest that air pollution is associated with insidious effects on structural brain ageing, even in dementia and stroke-free individuals.”

The evaluation included total cerebral brain volume, a marker of age-associated brain atrophy; hippocampal volume, which reflects changes in the area of the brain that controls memory; and white matter volume, which can be used as a measure of pathology and ageing.

The study, published in the journal Stroke, found that an increase of only two microgrammes per cubic metre of air in PM2.5, a range commonly observed across US cities, was associated with being more likely to have ischemic stroke and smaller cerebral brain volume, equivalent to approximately one year of brain ageing.

Dr Wilker added: “These results are an important step in helping us learn what is going on in the brain.

“The mechanisms through which air pollution may affect brain ageing remain unclear, but systemic inflammation resulting from the deposit of fine particles in the lungs is likely important.”

Dr Sudha Seshadri, professor of neurology at Boston University School of Medicine, said: “This study shows that for a two microgramme per cubic metre of air increase in PM2.5, a range commonly observed across major US cities, on average participants who lived in more polluted areas had the brain volume of someone a year older than participants who lived in less polluted areas. They also had a 46 per cent higher risk of silent strokes on MRI.

“This is concerning since we know that silent strokes increase the risk of overt strokes and of developing dementia, walking problems and depression. We now plan to look more at the impact of air pollution over a longer period; its effect on more sensitive MRI measures [and] on brain shrinkage over time; and other risks including of stroke and dementia.”

via Air pollution ‘can shrink middle-aged brains’ – The Scotsman.

Posted in Air Quality, Health Effects of Air Pollution | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Respro® Masks FAQ: What filter do I need?

What filter do I need?

You will need to determine what type of environment you will be using the mask in, a city environment or a countryside environment. Typically, if you are commuting every day with heavy or slow moving traffic, you should use the City™ filter. Although chemical pollutants can be found in the countryside; crop sprays, fertilisers etc., particulates are more likely to pose a potential problem, thus a Sportsta™ filter is likely to be the better option.

For more Frequently Asked Questions,  see Respro® Mask FAQ

Posted in Air Quality | Tagged | Leave a comment

Worried About China’s Air Pollution? The WHO Says Smoky Restaurants Are Even Worse

Which has the worst air quality: Beijing on a bad air pollution day or a restaurant with smokers?

The answer is the one with the smokers, according to the World Health Organization. The measure of fine, hazardous particulates in the air, known as PM 2.5 because they are less than 2.5 micrometers in diameter, reaches around 600 when there are just three smokers puffing away in a room, said Bernhard Schwartländer, the World Health Organization’s representative in China at an event Wednesday. Mr. Schwartländer didn’t specify the size of the room. He said that the PM 2.5 level goes up to 1,200 when there are five smokers present and up to 5,000 when there are 20.

The worst days in Beijing reach a PM 2.5 of 500 and the average levels in the city are just under 90, Mr. Schwartländer said.

“I don’t understand,” said Mr. Schwartländer, adding “Why don’t we see the same outcry that we see with the air pollution?” People make documentaries to draw attention to the air problems and wear masks to reduce their exposure, but they don’t draw attention to the harms of smoking and the millions of deaths it causes, he said. Every 30 seconds someone in China dies as a result of tobacco use, he said. Mr. Schwartländer argued there should be more outrage when people smoke near children or are exposed to second-hand smoke, adding, “The only way we can explain is that people simply don’t know.”

The World Health Organization is trying to clear the air by shining a light on the negative health impacts of smoking, just as Beijing prepares to implement its indoor smoking ban on June 1. The citywide ban takes aim at restaurants, bars and other indoor spots and officials can fine offenders 200 yuan (about $33) for individuals and 10,000 yuan for organizations and companies.

The WHO is also tapping celebrities like singer Zhang Liangying and real estate mogulPan Shiyi to  promote the ban and ensure it has advocates. Health experts say they are concerned about the efficacy of the forthcoming ban, which isn’t Beijing’s first.Previous ones failed due to lack of legal enforcement and public support, they say.

Government officials, also at the event Wednesday, conceded that it’ll be hard to stub out the butts. Beijing alone has 4 million smokers, said Fang Laiying, Director General of the Beijing Health and Family Planning Commission. Smokers will be resistant and feel that their own rights are being violated, Mr. Fang said. He said he’s reminding people that the government isn’t taking away their freedom but is instead protecting their right to health.

China is the world’s largest consumer and producer of tobacco, home to more than 300 million smokers and 43% of the world’s cigarette production, according to the American Cancer Society and the World Lung Foundation.

Mr. Pan says he’ll enforce the new rule at his SOHO real estate complexes around the city, which are monolithic office and retail spaces, housing thousands of workers. He didn’t give any explicit details on how. The Beijing government launched this month an account on social messaging app WeChat, encouraging people to report violators and tattle on smokers who are caught in the act by uploading images or videos of them.

Mr. Fang said tattlers will not be financially rewarded, but the government does need help enforcing the ban. “We need buy in,” he said.

via Worried About China’s Air Pollution? The WHO Says Smoky Restaurants Are Even Worse – China Real Time Report – WSJ.

Posted in Air Quality, Asia, China | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Traffic emissions may pollute one in three Canadian homes

Air pollution could be spreading up to three times farther than thought, contributing to varying levels of air quality across cities, a trio of recently published studies from a team of engineers has found. One in three Canadians, and half of all Torontonians, lives within 250 meters of at least one major roadway. Poor air quality from traffic pollution is associated with a number of health issues.

A trio of recently published studies from a team of University of Toronto engineers has found that air pollution could be spreading up to three times farther than thought–contributing to varying levels of air quality across cities.

Past research on air pollution from vehicle tailpipes has shown poor air quality anywhere between 100 to 250 metres of major roadways.

But in a paper published in the recent edition of the journal Atmospheric Pollution Research, U of T chemical engineer Greg Evans (ChemE) and his partners at Environment Canada have found that concentrations of pollutants from traffic are still double at a distance of 280 metres downwind from highway 400 north of Toronto.

One in three Canadians, and half of all Torontonians, lives within 250 meters of at least one major roadway. These roads, says Evans, range from 10-lane highways to most four-lane streets with steady traffic.

“We used to think that living near a major road meant that you lived near a lot of air pollution,” says Evans. “But what we’re finding is that it’s not that simple, someone living right on a major road in the suburbs may not be exposed to as much pollution as someone living downtown on a side street near many major roads.”

In the same study, Evans demonstrated that for somebody living near multiple roads, they could be exposed to up to ten times more pollutants than if they didn’t live near any major roads.

“It used to be that we measured air quality on a regional or city scale,” says Evans. “But now we’re starting to understand that we need to measure air quality on a more micro scale, especially around major roadways.”

According to Health Canada, poor air quality from traffic pollution is associated with a number of health issues, such as asthma in children and other respiratory diseases, heart disease, cancer, and increased rates of premature death in adults. The Canadian Medical Association attributes 21,000 premature deaths each year in Canada to air pollution. A separate study published last month also linked traffic pollution to delayed cognitive development in children.

Lab in a truck

Throughout 2014, the research team travelled the streets of Toronto measuring vehicle emissions from a mobile lab that resembles a Canada Post mail truck.

“One of the aspects of our work that’s unique is that we’re using real-time instruments to make measurements in seconds,” says Evans. “You have to do the measurements right there, right away, or the exhaust will be gone.”

The team’s findings suggest that people living or spending time near major roadways could be exposed to elevated levels of a dangerous chemical brew of ultrafine particles, volatile organic compounds, black carbon and other pollutants.

“The ultrafine particles are particularly troubling,” says Evans. “Because they are over 1000 times smaller than the width of a human hair, they have a greater ability to penetrate deeper within the lung and travel in the body.”

On a typical summer day in Toronto, Evans’ instruments measure approximately 20,000 ultrafine particles in each cubic centimetre of air. This means that for every average breath, Torontonians are inhaling 10 million of these nano-sized particles. These numbers increases to 30,000 and 15 million in the winter, when there is more stagnant air and less evaporation of the compounds.

25% of cars causing 90% of pollution

A second paper by Evans and colleagues, published in the March 2015 edition of the journal Atmospheric Measurement Techniques, suggests that a small number of older or “badly tuned” cars and trucks produce the majority of vehicle pollution.

The study made on-the-spot measurements of 100,000 vehicles as they drove past air-sampling probes of the main laboratory on College Street, one of Toronto’s many major roadways.

Evans and team found that one-quarter of the vehicles on the road produced:

95% of black carbon (or “soot”),

93% of carbon monoxide,

and 76% of volatile organic compounds such as benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and xylenes, some of which are known-carcinogens

“The most surprising thing we found was how broad the range of emissions was,” says Evans. “As we looked at the exhaust coming out of individual vehicles, we saw so many variations. How you drive, hard acceleration, age of the vehicle\e, how the car is maintained–these are things we can influence that can all have an effect on pollution.”

A vehicle emissions map of Toronto

A third paper, due out in the June 2015 edition of the journal Atmospheric Environment, looks at variations in traffic pollution throughout Toronto, evaluating how exposure to largely unexplored, unregulated ultrafine particles varies across the city.

Evans is currently working with Environment Canada, the Ontario Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change and Metro Vancouver to design, test and install new air quality measurement stations around the cities of Toronto and Vancouver. These stations will support enhanced monitoring of the air quality health index during this summer’s Pan Am games in Toronto. More broadly, this research will provide a basis for future near road air quality monitoring in cities across Canada so as to get a more accurate portrayal of the exposure of Canadians to traffic pollution.

Evans and team hope that their research may someday lead to policy changes that could help better target the small number of vehicles that pollute the most, as well as to better decide where to build schools, hospitals, daycares, seniors residences and other structures to protect people who are especially vulnerable to air pollution.

via Traffic emissions may pollute one in three Canadian homes — ScienceDaily.

Posted in Air Quality, USA & Canada | Tagged , , | Leave a comment