Air pollution: Car industry hub Stuttgart urges auto ban 

Residents of one of Germany’s foremost car manufacturing bases have been asked to leave their vehicles at home after smog breached maximum safe levels.

The south-western city of Stuttgart is home to Daimler – the makers of Mercedes – and Porsche.

Stuttgart’s mayor urged residents to use public transport or electric taxis, or to form carpools.

Stuttgart is the first city in Germany to issue an official alarm over levels of polluting particles in the air.

On Monday, levels of harmful PM10 particles in Stuttgart reached 89 microgramsper cubic meter – nearly double the safe maximum of 50 micrograms, according to the regional environment agency for the state of Baden-Wuerttemberg.

In a statement (in German), the city website urged residents to use public transport, electric taxis, or form carpools.

Some 500,000 car journeys are made each day in Stuttgart – the home of the famous Daimler and Porsche brands.

In a statement (in German), the city council also asked employers to let staff work flexible hours or even from home. It advised against using wood-burning stoves which could increase pollution levels.

“The aim is to improve the quality of life in Stuttgart,” the statement said.

Authorities acted after meteorologists warned there was a danger that cancer-causing particles would be trapped in the air above the city for several days.

They said it was because a layer of warm air higher up would prevent the particle-rich colder air near the ground from rising out of the city.

Source: Air pollution: Car industry hub Stuttgart urges auto ban – BBC News

Posted in Air Quality, Europe, Germany | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Log fires or traffic fumes: what’s the real cause of Bergen’s air pollution? 

A recent spate of bad air days caused the Norwegian city to introduce a controversial alternate-day car ban. Yet research shows the burning of logs in homes is a far bigger contributor to Bergen’s pollution problems

The air quality in Norway’s second largest city, Bergen, grew so bad earlier this month that the council surprised residents by introducing a week-long, alternate-day plan for private vehicles based on their number plates. Cars with odd-numbered endings were allowed to drive on odd dates, while those with even endings could drive on even dates.

The plan, which terminated on 13 January as snowfall finally cleaned the air, reflected the fact that traffic is typically raised in public debates as the major cause of this pollution. But the reality is rather different: new research shows that in Norway, the burning of logs in homes is a far bigger contributor to the problem than traffic – and more damaging to residents’ health.

Recently, the Norwegian Institute for Air Research (NILU) published statistics showing that “particulate matter from log burning in cities is more dangerous than pollution from traffic”. Research by Statistics Norway (SSB), meanwhile, concluded that 61% of the particulate matter in Norway’s air stems from its 1.7 million existing log fires, compared to 39% from private vehicles, buses and lorries.

With more than 275,000 inhabitants, Bergen is the largest city on the western coast of Norway. Surrounded by seven mountains, its picturesque city centre boasts timber seaside warehouses that are on Unesco’s world heritage list. Its proximity to Norway’s fjords keeps residents and visitors in close contact with natural delights both green and blue.

That such a reputedly unspoilt city has become so heavily polluted is a subject of major concern for its inhabitants, and the causes are much discussed by local media. As well as the vehicle traffic and the grey, at times black, smoke from private and public chimneys, Bergen’s deep-water port also services huge supply ships that move equipment to oil installations out in the North Sea.

In winter, the weather phenomenon of temperature inversion worsens the situation. A horizontal “lid” forms over the city when the air near the ground is colder (and so heavier) than the air above it, trapping the polluted air which then fills up with more particles from vehicles, log- and oil-burners.

People with heart- or lung-related illnesses are periodically encouraged to stay indoors to avoid being exposed to this pollution. For the worst hit, it can be like breathing through a straw while your nose is blocked; for others, sore throats and eyes are the typical symptoms. Over the years, numerous residents have moved out of the city in order to improve their quality of life.

Terje Kindt-Lien, a retired engineer who was born and still lives in Bergen, recalls days 40 years ago when the city centre was hardly visible from the hillsides above due to the coke and log fires burning in peoples’ homes. In his view, “the effect of the alternate car-use scheme has been marginal – I notice an extremely small difference. Visually, the impression is still that the air is grey.”

Kindt-Lien is concerned that other sources of pollution are not being adequately dealt with: “The main polluter is perhaps not the private car,” he says. “The city council’s former deposit scheme for exchanging old private log burners with modern ones used to offer 5,000 krone (£400) per burner, but it was terminated a few years ago as it seems they ran out of money. It could be reintroduced. The municipality has also not ordered all public buildings to terminate the use of oil for heating.”

Kindt-Lien is also troubled by all the supply ships that visit Bergen’s port: “While the focus has been on the private car, one supply ship during 24 hours emits the equivalent pollution of 4,800 cars. So, the alternate car ban is unbalanced.”

Across several Norwegian cities, it has been reported that death tolls for people with heart and lung disease generally increase three-to-five days after pollution levels peak. According to Christina Guerreiro from NILU: “1,700 Norwegians die prematurely every year from being exposed to log fire particulate matter.”

This is confirmed by data from the European Environment Agency which records that, of approximately 2,000 Norwegians who died prematurely in 2012 because of air pollution, “more than 80% of the deaths were not caused by nitric oxide from diesel fumes – but by the fine small particles stemming from burning wood”.

According to Guerreiro, these particles – known as PM2.5 – not only enter deep into people’s lungs but also “the blood circulation system and have an impact on the cardiovascular system [heart and blood vessels]”.

Speaking while the alternate car-use scheme was in effect, Bergen’s councillor for climate, Julie Andersland, said she was aware of the potential effects of log burning but that the council had not yet discussed a ban. “In Bergen, it is hard to ban heating by logs because of other health-related worries, including people freezing. We have many poorly insulated, old timber houses where log fires are a major heat source. But we are working on this. If a ban is considered, the city council will have to agree on a new regulation and we are not there yet.”

Two days later, a message on the Bergen council website stated that the city “has started working on the introduction of a deposit scheme for old log burners to be implemented as soon as possible”.

Other European cities have already acted to deal with the challenges of log fires. From 1 January 2015, the use of log fires for heating was banned in Paris and seven of its surrounding regions (the ban includes open fireplaces and log burners). From the same date, 435 other cities in France banned open fireplaces.

This ban was enforced because of the low heating efficiency of open fireplaces (less than 20% of a log’s energy ends up as heat in the room), and the heavy air pollution caused by not burning the logs properly. Modern, clean-burning and closed fireplaces are not banned; their higher efficiency, around 80%, results in less particulate matter.

Andersland said she was aware of the Paris ban, adding that “there has not yet been a wide discussion in Bergen on this, although I get more and more input from people on the issue nowadays”.

It is a controversial subject, not least because Norwegians love their log fires. In 2013, the state-owned TV station NRK famously televised a 12-hour, prime-time “slow” programme on log fires titled “National Firewood evening, night and morning”. According to the New York Times, “The programme consisted mostly of people in parkas chatting and chopping in the woods – and then eight hours of a fire burning in a fireplace.” It followed on the heels of the bestselling book, Norwegian Wood: Chopping, Drying and Stacking Wood the Scandinavian Way, by Lars Mytting.

In addition, Norwegians can be reluctant to “talk down” the traditional image of Norway as a huge, unspoilt land and beautiful country, in spite of hard-hitting air quality data from both national and international institutions.

In December 2014, for example, the EFTA Surveillance Authority decided to take Norway to its court for a breach of the EU’s Air Quality Directive, following a complaint by the Norwegian Asthma and Allergy Association. Norway lost.The judgment stated: “It is indisputable that the tolerance levels were surpassed in Oslo, Bergen, Trondheim and the western region as early as 2008.”

So now, even if only temporarily, Bergen has had to do what the Greek capital, Athens, did decades ago: introduce alternate-day car use. “There has been an expected traffic reduction of 14-19% so far,” Andersland told the Guardian after five days of the ban. “When we tried this in 2010 the effect was 25%, but at that time there were fewer exemptions than today.”

Critics of the scheme, however, say it did little to address the fact that some cars produce much more pollution than others. Meanwhile, the grey smoke keeps on rising from Bergen’s chimneys, and the dangers of log burning are barely on the agenda.

Professor Harald N Røstvik specialises in sustainable architecture at the Bergen School of Architecture and UiS, and is the author of Corruption the Nobel Way: Dirty Fuels and the Sunshine Revolution

 

Source: Log fires or traffic fumes: what’s the real cause of Bergen’s air pollution? | Cities | The Guardian

Posted in Air Quality, Europe | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

What is China doing to tackle its air pollution? 

The air in much of China is so bad the government has repeatedly declared “war” on it. The enemy are tiny particulates which spew forth from countless cars, coal-fired power stations and steel plants to create a dense, putty-coloured smog.

Beijing recently issued its first pollution ‘red alert‘, closing schools, factories and construction sites, and ordering half of all private cars off the road.

But these measures were only temporary. In a country where millions of people still look to industrialisation to lift them from poverty, what can China do to clear the air for good?

Four experts talk to the BBC World Service Inquiry programme.


Dr Jim Zhang: Frustrating that Olympic gains have been lost

Dr Jim Zhang, is a professor of global environmental health at Duke University and works in the US and China.

“You can definitely smell the pollution. Your eyes itch, you cough. It’s like a very rich, dense soup when the pollution levels are very high: thousands of chemicals, gases that are irritants, carcinogens.

“We have particles that have a diameter smaller than a virus. Human hair is very big compared to these. The larger ones will be deposited into the lung – that’s the biggest worry. But recent scientific evidence shows that when the particles are small enough they go into the bloodstream, they can go directly into the brain.

“It’s very hard to get data to show whether the pollution is going to have a long-lasting effect, like a cancer, but there is a reason to believe that, because the pollution soup contains chemicals which can induce cancer.

“It’s very frustrating to see pollution get worse after the huge effort which went into cleaning up the air in Beijing for the Olympics.

“I did several studies demonstrating that if you do a temporary intervention to bring the air pollution down, [and] measure cardiovascular and respiratory health indicators in young healthy people, all those indicators significantly improve.

“Women whose pregnancy was during those eight weeks of improved air quality got babies with a significantly higher birth weight, and we have a large database to show that in general if your birth weight is higher, your later life is healthier.

“In 2008 the air quality data was considered a state secret. The government was in a denial stage for years until 2013 when those huge episodes happened, and then they started to say ‘This is real now’. Because of [prioritising] economic interest over public health interest, the way they implement the existing air quality regulations is very inefficient.

“Although it’s now getting much better – the urgency is there – it’s still very challenging.”


Hongjun Zhan: Legislation is better; enforcement is still weak

Hongjun Zhan used to write China’s air pollution laws and now works for a US law firm advising foreign companies operating in China.

“Back in the late 1980s, people didn’t really think about air issues at that time. The pressure [to get the legislation right] was not big at all.

“From the late 1980s to, let’s say, the year 2000, just about a dozen years, that air quality has been getting worse and worse.

“In many situations, industry discharges pollutants without meeting standards. And very often they are not penalised by the enforcement officers.

“The law drafters today are doing a much better job than I did. The environmental laws today are more aggressive: [more] detailed, accurate, and comprehensive than the law I wrote.

“Enforcement is still not good enough. It is slightly better, but it’s still far from where it should be.”


Li Yan: ‘Red alerts’ represent real progress

Li Yan is the voice of Greenpeace in China.

“Actually what’s happening in China right now is quite positive. [The red alert] is a sign of progress in government’s understanding of how they should react and respond to these extreme conditions.

“Not only is it responding to 20 million Beijingers’ demand for clean air, it’s also setting a precedent for many other Chinese cities to follow.

“After the ‘airpocalypse’ in 2011/2012, the central government responded with a National Air Pollution Action Plan. At the core of that is a scheme to cut back coal use in the big metropolitan regions.

“Beijing’s extreme pollution and the ‘red alert’ are connected to China’s addiction to coal burning, and it’s very energy intensive way of industrial growth. Coal burning is the biggest single source of air pollution in China, and burning of coal, has for the first time in this century declined in 2014 compared to 2013.

“That’s a very significant thing. As a result air quality in the major cities like Beijing and regions in the Yangtze River Delta has seen improvements.

“Greenpeace has been capturing the government-released hour-by-hour data of 190 cities, and only 15% of them have seen an increase of their readings, and all the rest of them are more or less improved.

“We’re seeing renewable energy picking up and taking larger share of total power use in China, and then it’s actually already eating up the market space of coal.

“New coal power plants are still being proposed and still being invested [in] by local government and state-owned enterprises as if it was still the good old days. However I doubt there will be enough demand to support them, and they will very likely become idle plants.”


Mun Ho: Economic slowdown is complicating anti-pollution efforts

Mun Ho is an economist at the Harvard University China project, specialising in Chinese environmental policies.

“The Chinese system is very decentralised: the provincial and local city authorities have a lot of power. And it is not a simple matter of the central government in Beijing pressing a button and all the laws are enforced.

“All the city environmental protection bureaus are in charge of enforcing [pollution] laws, and you can imagine there is a wide range of enforcement standards across the country.

“For the past 30 years, the main criteria of promotion other than maintaining security, is economic growth, the competition to bring jobs and growth.

“We should align incentives so that the environmental officials have the incentive to enforce the rules throughout the system, not just the central government.

“The unexpected economic slowdown and the prolonged global recession has been a new challenge. It is complicating efforts to convince people to put in costly pollution equipment and to think about energy-saving technologies.

“China is officially growing at about 7%, but that hides quite a big range of experience. In some places – in the ‘rust belts’ – growth has really decelerated, perhaps even to 2%.

“The priority obviously then is to prevent layoffs and factory shutdowns. They have to worry about social stability if there is high unemployment.

“The issue really is spending a bigger part of the government’s budget on pollution control equipment. Governments today are rich enough that this is no longer such a very big issue. We are not talking about building houses versus building pollution control equipment. This is no longer the stark choice facing China today.”

The Inquiry is broadcast on the BBC World Service on Tuesdays from 12:05 GMT. Listen online or download the podcast.

Source: What is China doing to tackle its air pollution? – BBC News

Posted in Air Quality, Asia, China | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

How air pollution could harm YOUR chances of having a baby 

Scientists from Boston University revealed women who live close to major roads may struggle to become pregnant, and warned though small, the risk could pose a ‘global health problem’.

  • Areas of heavy pollution and traffic are linked to infertility, a study found
  • Women who live near major roadways have 11% higher risk of infertility
  • City couples with fertility issues may want to relocate, scientists suggest

Living in the city can harm a woman’s fertility, scientists revealed.

 

The high levels of air pollution and traffic fumes associated with heavily populated areas increases a woman’s risk of infertility, according to a new study from Boston University.

Furthermore, city dwellers are far more likely to have fertility problems than those who live in the country – because country air is cleaner.

Dr Sajal Gupta of Cleveland Clinic, who wasn’t involved in the study, told Reuters: ‘Couples suffering from infertility need to exercise caution especially if they are residing in areas with high ambient particulate matter.

‘Relocating to areas with low contamination of particulate matter is an alternative to prevent adverse impact on fertility.’

However, researchers cautioned, the increased risk was only slight.

The study followed more than 36,000 women from 1993 to 2003.

Scientists analyzed air pollution and traffic exhaust near their homes to see if there is a link between the air they breathed and their ability to conceive.

During the study period, there were nearly 2,500 reported cases of infertility.

Women who lived within 199 meters – or about a tenth of a mile – of a major roadway were 11 per cent more likely to experience fertility issues, the study found.

Lead study author Dr Shruthi Mahalingaiah said: ‘The risks are slight.’

However, Mark Nieuwenhuijsen, a researcher at the Center for Research in Environmental Epidemiology and the Barcelona Institute for Global Health, said even the slight increased risk can present a global health problem.

Dr Nieuwenhuijsen said: ‘For an individual woman, the results may not be that important because the risk of infertility only increases slightly, but for society as a whole it is important because so many women are exposed to pollution.’

The study examined data on particulate matter – which is a mixture of solid particles and liquid droplets that include dust, dirt, soot and smoke – found near the participants’ homes.

The scientists also assessed how close their homes were to major roads.

The team of researchers focused on primary infertility – which is when a woman tries to conceive for at least a year without success.

 

They also looked at secondary infertility – which occurs when a couple struggles to conceive again after having at least one prior pregnancy.

Those who lived close to major roads were five per cent more likely to report primary infertility.

And, those same women were also 21 per cent more likely to report secondary fertility than women who lived further away.

The link between air quality and fertility problems was found even in areas with less polluted air.

But, the association became stronger as the pollution levels increased.

However, the scientists didn’t know the exact dates when conception efforts started or infertility was diagnosed, which could provide a limitation to the study’s finding.

Dr Mahlingaiah added that while the study is one of the first of its kind to follow women over such a long period of time, more research is needed before any medical recommendations are made.

Yet, Dr Christopher Somers of the University of Regina, who wasn’t involved in the study, said: ‘Air pollution is worse near major roads with high traffic volumes, so avoid living in these areas if you can.

‘If this is not an option, pay attention to air quality advisories and adjust outdoor activities accordingly.’

The study was published in the journal Human Reproduction.

 

Source: How air pollution could harm YOUR chances of having a baby | Daily Mail Online

Posted in Air Quality, Health Effects of Air Pollution, Medical Studies | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

From London to Delhi, air pollution kills. Why do we do nothing? 

Pollution in some world cities is more than 12 times higher than safe levels. Maybe it explains why residents aren’t taking to the streets to complain

After a week in Kolkata, blessed with mellow sunsets created by the yellowy haze that hung over the city, I flew back to Britain via Delhi on Friday. Our descent into Delhi was delayed because of fog, we were told, but the nicotine-coloured blanket smothering this dynamic Indian city was a malignant smog.

Delhi, a city of 25 million people and nine million vehicles, routinely experiences fine particulate pollution above 300 micrograms per cubic metre; the EU’s legal limit is 25. These figures are not abstract even for visitors. After just a few days in Kolkata and minutes in Delhi, I developed the dry hack known as “the Delhi cough”. Exert yourself outdoors and soon your eyes are streaming and your lungs aching.

Fifteen of the 20 most polluted places identified by the World Health Organisation are in India and China but winter smogs have hung over Barcelona, Milan and Naples, and this month some London streets breached annual EU limits for nitrogen dioxide in just a week. A recent study in Nature found that more people – 1.4 million people a year in China and 650,000 in India – die from air pollution than malaria and HIV combined.

Clean air should be a global priority, and it is puzzling that it is not. Unlike, say, climate change, toxic air is identifiable by the layperson, indisputably of the here-and-now, and kills rich as well as poor, which should make it a seductive subject for problem-solving by politicians.

But Britain is avoiding decisive action to scrap diesel vehicles, and India keeps the home fires burning because it is growing at 7.4%, faster than any major economy. Kolkata is plastered with government adverts urging investors to “ride the growth”. Presumably they mean in an SUV. We should be so much smarter.

Perhaps air pollution hasn’t been solved because no one makes a fuss: scarier than the smog in Delhi, Kolkata and London is the stoicism of residents for whom bad air has become part of daily life. I suppose it’s understandable why they’re not taking to the streets.

Where Seagulls dare

I visited Kolkata as part of an exchange organised by Writers’ Centre Norwich, in which writers from East Anglia and Kolkata swap cities and stories. Both places possess a rich intellectual past – but my most inspiring encounter was with the future, found on a dusty side-street.

Seagull Books, a highbrow publishing house, is a book-lovers’ fantasy. It translates into English exciting new writers from around the world as well as previously untranslated works by the likes of Roland Barthes, and sells these beautifully designed books globally. It makes London’s publishing scene look narrow-minded and blandly commercial. But Seagull is commercial too, tapping into its global audience. Kolkata, where students buy books by the kilo from hundreds of street bookstalls, sparks an uplifting thought: the future of English-language publishing, and literature, lies in India.

Feel my pane

After five years avoiding long-haul flights, I was amazed by the transformation of the aeroplane in my absence. I flew to India in a Boeing 787 Dreamliner whose high internal ceilings reduce claustrophobia and large windows offer panoramic views – of the smog stretching to the Himalayas.

These windows no longer have blinds, and I pressed a little button to turn the pane from opaque to clear to admire the snow-capped peaks of Afghanistan. Suddenly, a central switch was flicked and all windows were forcibly darkened. Airline passengers are already denied almost any autonomy and the possibility of gazing at our planet is the most joyful freedom in flying. It also calms my nerves. How sad that technological advances are so often accompanied by an intensification of control.

 

Source: From London to Delhi, air pollution kills. Why do we do nothing? | Patrick Barkham | Opinion | The Guardian

Posted in Air Quality, Asia, Europe, India, London, UK | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Tehran air pollution at alarming levels

Air pollution in the Iranian capital, Tehran, has reached an alarming level once again, prompting authorities to shut down kindergartens and primary schools.

َAccording to secretary of Tehran’s Air Pollution Emergency Committee, Mohammad Hadi Heidarzadeh, kindergartens and primary schools in the capital city will remain closed on Monday and Tuesday.

Traffic will be also limited according to the last two digits on the license plate of automobiles, and smoke-belching cars will be fined or towed away as well on Monday.

Meteorological Department of Tehran Province announced on Sunday that severe stagnant weather will lead to soaring air pollution in the upcoming days.

Tehran, with an estimated population of 14 million people, faced severe air pollution for 18 consecutive days in December.

On December 28, 107 Iranian lawmakers gave a written notice to President Hassan Rouhani, calling for the adoption of necessary measures to tackle the deteriorating air pollution.

They said the president and his Cabinet should implement measures to improve health conditions for Iranians, particularly children and the elderly.

The lawmakers’ notice came two days after the vice president and head of Iran’s Department of Environment, Massoumeh Ebtekar, said the government has made great efforts to tackle air pollution but it is impossible to overcome all previous shortcomings in a short time.

Eighty percent of Tehran’s pollution is blamed on exhaust fumes emitted from five million cars.

Source: PressTV-Tehran air pollution at alarming levels

Posted in Air Quality, Iran, Middle East | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Air pollution: a dark cloud of filth poisons the world’s cities 

The number of annual deaths caused by pollution around the world is now greater than malaria and HIV combined, according to a recent study, with scientists warning that fatalities could reach 6 million a year by 2050

During these cold winter days, Anumita Choudhury dare not leave her small second-floor apartment in Delhi’s northern suburbs. Elderly now, she has developed asthma. The last time she ventured into the streets of the world’s second most populous city she began gasping for breath and had to be helped home by her neighbours.

The story is the same in many of the world’s great cities. From Kabul in Afghanistan to Hong Kong and Shijiazhuang in China, and from Lima to São Paulo in Latin America, people are increasingly suffering in severe toxic smogs – leaving hospitals and health clinics flooded with people with respiratory and heart problems.

Foul air has blanketed much of urban Asia for many weeks already this winter. In Delhi, where there are nearly nine million vehicles, the high court has compared conditions to “living in a gas chamber”; Beijing and 10 other Chinese cities have issued red alert warnings; in Tehran, where the mayor, Mehdi Chamran, says air pollution kills up to 180 people a day, the smog has been so bad that schools have been closed and sports banned.

According to the World Health Organisation, the toxic fumes of growing numbers of diesel cars are combining with ammonia emissions from farming, wood and coal fires, tyre burning, open rubbish dumps, and dust from construction sites and brick kilns. The consequence is a global crisis that threatens to overwhelm countries’ economies as people succumb to heart and respiratory diseases, blood vessel conditions, strokes, lung cancers and other long-term illnesses.

The toxic haze blanketing cities was observed last week from the international space station.

“It’s bad now, but we just don’t know what will happen in future,” says María Neira, WHO public health chief. “This is the first generation in human experience exposed to such high levels of pollution. In the 19th century pollution was bad, but it was concentrated in just a few places. Now there are huge numbers of people living with high levels of pollution. Nearly 70% of people in cities are exposed to pollution above recommended levels.”

The problem is most acute in Asia, but many industrialised countries have been hit by smog this winter. Milan, Naples, Barcelona and some other cities in Spain declared an emergency and banned traffic for several days over Christmas; Poland’s most popular mountain resort, Zakopane, was choked in fumes; and several London streets breached their annual limits for nitrogen dioxide just days into 2016.

According to a recent study in Nature, led by Johannes Lelieveld, director of the Max Planck Institute for chemistry in Germany, more people now die from air pollution than malaria and HIV combined. They include 1.4 million people a year in China and 650,000 in India. This compares with about 180,000 a year in Europe.

New WHO figures on 2,000 cities, to be released next month, will show pollution worsening in many countries. At the last count in 2014, 15 out of the 20 most polluted places were in India and China. The others were in Pakistan, Iran and Bangladesh. Of the worst 100, nearly 70 were in Asia and only a handful in Europe or the US.

But the WHO figures include only those cities that measure air pollution, and many of the worst offenders do not. “As the world urbanises, the pollution grows,” says Frank Kelly, director of environmental health research at King’s College London. “We suspect that many African cities have terrible pollution problems, but there is very little data. We know that places like Tehran are very polluted. In Europe the pollution is relatively clear in places like Germany, France and Britain, except for the diesel, but in eastern Europe, where they still have old industries, it is still very bad.”

After years of being discounted as an unavoidable cost of economic progress, air pollution is rising up the political and economic agendas, as developing countries grasp that the crisis threatens to cripple their economies and lead to simmering dissent.

Screen Shot 2016-01-18 at 08.11.37

According to a recent WHO study, the cost of disease and the premature deaths caused in Europe every year by air pollution was more than $1.6trillion in 2010, nearly 10% of the gross domestic product of the EU in 2013. The UK was estimated to have suffered $83bn (£54bn) in costs associated with air pollution. Elsewhere in Europe, the figures were Germany $145bn, and France $53bn. The highest was in Bulgaria, which spent an estimated 29.5% of its GDP on the costs of air pollution fatalities.

More than 90% of citizens in the European region are exposed to annual levels of outdoor fine particulate matter above WHO’s air quality guidelines. This accounted for 482,000 premature deaths in 2012, from heart and respiratory diseases, blood vessel conditions and strokes, and lung cancer.

As concern over pollution grows, cities have begun to take action. On Friday, Delhi ended a two-week trial that took a third of the city’s three million private cars off the road by alternating entry to an odd and even number plates scheme and a ban on large diesel SUVs. City authorities said the trial resulted in a 50% drop in air pollution “primarily caused by vehicular traffic”, but this is disputed.

China has recognised the problem and copied western countries by moving power stations out of cities. This, along with years of heavy investment in renewable energy and increased fines for polluting industries, has improved air quality in some areas. However, away from big cities such as Beijing and Shanghai pollution is still bad.

“It was inevitable in places like London in the 19th century, when health was not considered so important,” says Neira. “But today it is irresponsible to allow it, and the argument of economic development is not valid. We need to develop a different culture in our cities. We need much better public policies.

“It needs social pressure and more awareness. There is no going back. People will not accept pollution. But not cities are aware how serious it is.”

If emissions continue to rise at current rates, the number of smog-induced deaths could double to more than six million a year by 2050, says Lelieveld.

“It is a grim scenario, but I doubt people will accept a doubling of pollution. It is a warning. Pollution is still getting worse, but the awareness is changing and there is a willingness to deal with the problem.”

Global picture

BEIJING

The Chinese capital has long suffered from serious air pollution from coal burning and industry, but embarrassment at the Olympic Games, the closure of many factories and the removal of power plants from the centre have drastically cut pollution levels. There is a new willingness to deal with it, but pollution remains a big public health threat and Beijing was one of 10 Chinese cities that declared an emergency red alert last month.

KABUL

The fast-growing Afghan capital city is one of the unhealthiest in the world, surrounded by hills that trap pollution for days on end and full of cars and buses burning low-quality fuel and millions of houses being warmed with wood and paraffin. According to doctors in the main hospital, air pollution is now the greatest cause of death, killing more than 3,000 people a year – more than from war, terrorism, road accidents or HIV and Aids. Air pollution is also bad in other Afghan cities such as Herat, Kandahar, Jalalabad and Mazar.

TEHRAN

Iranian cities are among the most polluted. Last month the air in Tehran was so bad the city shut all schools, put emergency services on full alert and advised people with cardiac and respiratory problems, as well as pregnant women, to remain indoors. Some of the pollution in the city of five million cars has been blamed on sanctions on imports of refined petrol. This, it is said, has led to the use of low-quality alternatives.

DHAKA

Bangladeshi cities such as Dhaka, Narayanganj and Gazipur are some of the most polluted and fastest growing in the world. Brick kilns, tyre burning, old cars and heavy traffic combine to make them dangerous to live in. “What good is a growth rate of 6% if the air is unbreathable and puts people at high risks of respiratory diseases and other health problems?” a recent editorial in the New Age newspaper asked.

LAGOS

Air pollution in the fast-growing Nigerian city, the largest in Africa, is reaching dangerous levels. But, as in many cities on the continent, there’s little monitoring of pollution and no accurate information on fuel consumption. Pollution is likely to be as bad as the worst of Indian and Chinese cities.

BAKERSFIELD

Los Angeles used to be notorious for its smogs but cleaner cars and better regulation has improved air quality. Some of the worst air in the US is now found in nearby Bakersfield in the San Joaquin Valley, a farming area surrounded by mountains that trap pollution from traffic and agricultural emissions. Warm weather often leads to dangerous photo-chemical smogs.

LIMA

Peru’s capital has the worst pollution in Latin America, according to a 2014 study by the World Health Organisation. Poor fuel, old buses and cars and the city’s geography between the Andes to the east and the Pacific Ocean to the west, all make the air foul at times. Nearly 80% of the estimated 5,000 deaths a year from pollution may be caused by the city’s fleet of old minivans and buses. The many poor areas are the most polluted and are often sited close to open waste dumps and other sources of pollution.

CAIRO

Air quality in the Egyptian capital city of more than seven million people is often 100 times above World Health Organisation safe limits. The toxic fumes of a million mostly old cars mixes with smoke from farmers burning rice straw, industrial pollutants and desert and construction work dust. Heart disease, stroke and respiratory infections are now among the top four causes of premature death in the capital. In August of last year, the Egyptian environment ministry declared a state of emergency to deal with a thick layer of pollution that hung over the city for days.

DELHI

With 9 million vehicles and 25 million people, Delhi is possibly the most polluted mega-city in the world, often covered in a foul-smelling toxic haze. The pollution was so bad last month that the city authorities imposed an on- and off-traffic system to try to reduce the number of cars of the choked roads. It also banned large diesel SUVs for two weeks but the full effects have not been analysed.

LONDON

Once known for its smogs because of massive coal burning, it is now plagued with noxious NO2 gas from hundreds of thousands of diesel engines and the particulates emitted by taxis, central heating systems and construction sites. The government does not expect the city to meet legal pollution levels until 2025. Last week London breached its own legal limit on air pollution for the whole of 2016 in just over seven days.

Source: Air pollution: a dark cloud of filth poisons the world’s cities | Global development | The Guardian

Posted in Africa, Air Quality, Asia, China, Europe, France, Germany, Health Effects of Air Pollution, India, Iran, Italy, Latin America, London, Middle East, Spain, UK, USA & Canada | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Scotland’s most-polluted streets revealed amid call for cleaner air 

A list of Scotland’s most-polluted streets shows more must be done to improve air quality, campaigners say.

Friends of the Earth Scotland said the list showed many streets are still failing to meet safety standards, meaning the Scottish Government could face legal action.

The environmental group analysed official data for two harmful pollutants, nitrogen dioxide (NO2) and coarse particles (PM10) which are known to be linked with serious health problems including heart attacks, strokes, respiratory illness and early death.

Campaigner Emilia Hanna said: “Streets are breaking legal limits in each major city in Scotland, demonstrating just how serious and widespread Scotland’s air pollution health crisis is.

“Air pollution causes over 2000 early deaths in Scotland each year at a cost of over £1.1bn to the economy. Air pollution increases the risk of heart attacks, strokes and asthma attacks and the main culprit is traffic.”

The eight most polluted streets for nitrogen dioxide in 2015 were:

Edinburgh St John’s Road – 65

Glasgow Hope Street – 60

Dundee Seagate – 50

Perth Atholl Street – 48

Dundee Lochee Road – 48

Aberdeen Union Street – 46

Edinburgh Queensferry Road – 41

Aberdeen Wellington Road – 41

 

Figures are in micro grammes per cubic metre(μg/m3), with the Scottish Air Quality Objective being 18, meaning these locations all fail the objective.

display

Ms Hanna said: “St John’s Road in Edinburgh now has the unfortunate title of being the most polluted street in Scotland with nitrogen dioxide levels well above Scottish safety standards. Edinburgh Council needs to take much more drastic action, including looking at restricting the most polluting vehicles with a Low Emission Zone.

“Four years after we first started publishing the list of the most polluted streets, we still find illegal levels, often in the same locations year after year. These are streets where people live, work and relax. The repeat offenders show us that local councils and the Scottish Government are not treating this public health crisis seriously enough.

“Glasgow Council is no longer measuring harmful particle pollution (PM10) in Anderston near a primary school, and on Hope Street in the city centre. Both these streets last year broke the safety standards so it is very hard to understand why the monitors have been switched off in these key known problem areas. You can’t make a pollution problem go away just by ignoring it.”

Edinburgh resident Irene Orr, recently retired, is a long-term asthma sufferer. She relies on an extensive range of medication each day to manage the condition.

She said: “There is no doubt that the traffic in Edinburgh has an impact on my asthma. The very calm days are the worst as traffic fumes don’t disperse as well.

“One of the reasons I come to Corstorphine so rarely is because there is always traffic congestion on St John’s Road and it’s so polluted.”

Friends of the Earth Scotland is now calling on more support for clean-air initiatives across the country.

Ms Hanna said: “The government must support local authorities with funding to implement low emission zones in all major cities. It must also increase its investment in walking and cycling paths so that it becomes safer and more convenient for people to leave their cars at home.

“It is unacceptable that the Government is throwing £3bn at dualling the A9 while funding for walking, cycling and public transport and measures to improve air quality remains very low. That is why we are calling on the Scottish Government to reallocate a portion of its motorways budget to active travel in the next budget.”

Source: Scotland’s most-polluted streets revealed amid call for cleaner air | Scotland | News

Posted in Air Quality, Europe, UK | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment